Analysis and Persuasion
|
Coherent, complex, sophisticated
arguments support thesis.
Examines multiple, [historical]
interpretations, evaluating the
context, reasoning, bias or
reliability of varied sources and
applies these through analysis to
its arguments.
Clearly, thoughtfully, and
thoroughly explains and analyzes
the connection between all
evidence and argument being
made.
|
Coherent, sometimes complex
arguments support thesis.
Argument draws on, explains and
critiques evidence from
alternative points of view.
Mostly clear and thoughtful
explanation or analysis of how
the evidence supports each
argument.
|
Coherent but rarely complex or
sophisticated arguments support
thesis.
Some alternative perspectives are
presented but not always well
examined or integrated.
Some explanation of how the
evidence presented supports each
argument, but the explanations
are not always clear and
thorough.
|
Arguments lack coherence and/or
clarity.
Alternative
arguments/perspectives are
either missing or poorly
integrated.
No explanation or analysis of how
or why the evidence supports each
argument.
|